No More Guns - 729 Words

Paul Chung Transition English Four April 21, 2011 Essay No more Guns The year 1774 was pivotal in the history of the United States. It marked the beginning of the Revolutionary war, which lasted thirteen years and claimed thousands of lives. Fighting against the British, the Americans had to rely on individual citizens because they did not have a well organized army. As famers and hunters, many citizens already owned guns. These rifles proved indispensable in defeating the British. After the war, citizens were reluctant to give up their rifles, as they feared future invasions. Because of this war an amendment was added to the Constitution of the United States guaranteeing citizens the right to bear arms. Times have changed, However.†¦show more content†¦Since the fact that, they outlawed guns, they rate of the crime decreased. Also, in Arizona, college students were able to access to the guns. Due to this there were a lot of crimes, because university students could not control themselves of the use of gun. This would not happen if college students were not able to get access to the guns. The streets access to the fight and college students would not carry around them. If guns were illegal, people would be less likely to harm loved ones in moments of anger. Once, a family was going a vacation. Then an 11-year-old boy was killed in an accidental gunfire in Sharma. The gun went off while one of the family members were unloading bags and did not know the gun was loaded. If the guns were banned, then they would not even have the gun from the first place. This could have prevent the lost live of that11- year-old boy. If the guns were illegal, people would harm their loved ones just like this poor boy. Some people say that they feel safer having a gun at home. However, if guns were more difficult to own, it would even be safer. Fewer guns would lead to a decrease in the number of gun-related crimes and victims. For example, an 11-years-old boy was killed in an accidental gunfire. Even though they believed that ha ving a gun with them would make them safer, the unintentional, accidental gunfire killed that poor 11-years-old boy. Guns should beShow MoreRelatedMore Guns, More Problems?792 Words   |  4 Pages More Guns, More Problems? It seems like every day I turn on the news there are more and more horrifying stories of violence around the United States. Our children are not safe playing outside in the front yard as they once were. The new terrifying social phenomenon going around today is violent rampage, shooting sprees or mass murder. Gun Violence has widespread effects, not only national grief but also stricter gun control laws that effect law-abiding citizens. The causes for gun violenceRead MoreMore Guns, More Violence1893 Words   |  8 Pages More Guns, More Violence Guns have been around for centuries; they’ve shaped countries, politics and the shape of human and animal life forever. Many look at guns as dangerous, and destructive to who humans are. Especially when we turn on the news and see another teenage boy killing children in middle America. Although we go root on our local military men and women as heroes. This paper will dive into the deep, vast, and grey area that is gun control and the problemsRead MoreAre Guns Equal More Violence?867 Words   |  4 Pageslarge quantity of guns in the United States are culpable for the country’s murder rates. While the United States population and number of guns have steadily gone up since 1994, the rates of all different crime types have drastically gone down (Planty). Over the last nineteen years, almost fifty million guns have been added to the US, yet firearm violence has been reduced by more than two thirds (Federal Bureau). This completely contradicts the statement that more guns equal more violence. To compareRead MoreMore Gun Control Essay946 Words   |  4 PagesMore Gun Control One of the biggest issues in the United States that I would change would be gun control. The government is constantly proposing legislation for more and more gun control. Slowly they are chipping away at our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. You must ask yourself: For what reason does the government want to restrict law-abiding citizens from owning guns? Certainly government is not so naive to think criminals will adhere to gun control laws. There justRead MoreNo More Gun Control Needed1281 Words   |  6 PagesNo More Gun Control Needed The debate of whether or not the government should ban the sell of guns, and attempt to remove all guns in existence has been debated for a long period of time; I believe that banning guns is not only implausible, it will do more harm than good. In this essay, I’ll be discussing the history of this debate, as well as discuss some misinformation that’s been proposed by those wishing to ban guns. I’ll also discuss how guns do not turn ordinary, law abiding citizens intoRead MoreRe : More Gun Control Essay1898 Words   |  8 PagesTO: Senator Ryan McDougal From: Sean T. Bowles (Researcher) Date: November 8, 2016 RE: More Gun Control in Virginia Executive Summary Today there is a problem with guns in our society. People have easy access to firearms and here in Virginia it is much easier for anyone to get a firearm through private sales without any kind of background check into their mental health or criminal status. The reason that this is a problem is because people who are able to get a weapon without having a backgroundRead MoreAmerica Needs More Guns: Say No to Gun Control Essay2237 Words   |  9 PagesGuns do not kill people, people do. The American Dream is being able to work towards and achieve whatever makes you happy, whether it be owning your own business, joining the military, or staying at home raising a family, but the only way to reach your dream is to do it without living in fear that your dream will be taken away. In the last couple years mass shootings and attacks on schools have sadly become a common tragedy. Those who have been victims of public shootings or any other life scarringRead MoreAmerica Needs More Gun Cont rol1881 Words   |  8 Pagesâ€Å"Give me the money.† She pulled out her gun from her back pocket and shot him in the toe. She didn’t kill him, but she prevented herself from getting killed. That gun saved her life and my life. You never know when something bad might happen. It could come out at any time, any day, anywhere. If my aunt hadn’t been allowed to carry that gun, we both might not be alive today. Even though some people believe America needs more gun control, this country needs less gun control because people need a way toRead MoreNo More Gun Control in America Essay570 Words   |  3 PagesClass, firearms have been an element of the American tradition as defense and a means of hunting or activity. As we progress through the 21st century the use of guns has changed significantly. Any additional gun laws should not be imposed on American citizens because of the second amendment, the need for protection, and the need for food and recreational sports. The second amendment in the United States Constitution clearly states that as American citizens, we have a right to bear arms. The ConstitutionRead MoreEssay America Needs More Gun Control1409 Words   |  6 PagesConstitution to the United States really mean? Does every citizen have the right to own a gun? Should there be limitations on who can possess a gun? Gun right advocates believe they have the right to possess a gun without restrictions. Gun Control advocates on the other hand support more limitations on the accessibility of guns and also want to ban certain types of guns. They argue that the more guns there are the more crime there will be. Is either one of these arguments justified? Which party is right

The Titular Character Of William Shakespeare s Macbeth

The titular character in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a typical hero who undergoes a series of nasty situations, and gradually loses his humanity in the process. Although he begins the play as a traditional hero, he most certainly does not retain that title towards the end. Over the course of the play, the reader can see Macbeth gradually decline in his mental and emotional state. From the beginning, he is portrayed as a traditional hero, with his courage on the battlefield and his honor at all times, not to mention his natural mercy and loyalty. Toward the end, however, he is a cruel and treacherous-as well as overly ambitious-tyrant. Throughout the play, we see challenges occur to make him this way, beginning from the point at which the witches spoke to him, and prophesied for him his rise to power. Before evaluating Macbeth’s character, it is important to define both a traditional hero and an anti-hero. Dictionary.com defines a hero as: â€Å"a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities.† The Macbeth that we see at the commencement of the play most certainly fits this description, and never better than in the opening remarks in regard to him by the sergeant. On the other hand, an anti-hero is described by the same source as: â€Å"a protagonist who lacks the attributes that make a heroic figure, as nobility of mind and spirit, a life or attitude marked by action or purpose, and the like†. What we see as the play progresses is thatShow MoreRelatedcompare and contrast1507 Words   |  7 PagesStory Time and Macbeth 4. Compare and contrast the dramatic function of deception in two plays. The two plays that are going to be compared are ‘Macbeth’ and â€Å"Old Story Time†. Macbeth is written by a well-known dramatist by the name of William Shakespeare. Old Story Time is written by one of Jamaica’s best playwrights Trevor Rhone. ‘Macbeth’ is often said to be one of Shakespear’s most powerful tragedies. According to Poem hunter.com William Shakespeare was widelyRead MoreMacbeth : Not A Rare Monster1832 Words   |  8 Pages Macbeth: Not a Rare Monster Many directors, actors, and audience members have different opinions regarding the titular character of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Harold Bloom, author of Bloom’s Guides: Macbeth, states that â€Å"Macbeth is a villain, indeed a monster of murderousness† (Bloom 7). Even Macbeth’s rival, Macduff, calls him a â€Å"rare monster† (Macbeth 1.5.76-8). Macbeth is not a rare monster, he is human. In fact his humanity is a major theme in both Shakespeare’s script and in manyRead MoreAnalysis Of William Shakespeare s Hamlet And Macbeth 1854 Words   |  8 PagesThe work of William Shakespeare is, to many, the purest representation of theatricality there is. He is the most instantly and internationally recognizable playwright, and so works like Hamlet and Macbeth have come to be seen as staples of the dramatic genre, expected to be studied and performed, with critical acclaim, on a massive scale. However, as with so many forms of art, Shakespeare s work was not necessarily appreciated as such in his own time, specifically by certain critics of the theatre

Pratt Essay Arts Of The Contact Zone Example For Students

Pratt Essay Arts Of The Contact Zone The moment at which I realized that Utopia was impossible to obtain, made it a mission to seek out the thing that would elf me accept different cultures and found a way to connect with them. I will be the first to say that was never taught that white people were bad, but was taught that they were different. As I grew, found myself subconsciously limiting myself to not only talking to just black people, but subjecting myself to act and talk a certain way. It wasnt until my juniors of high school that started to actually become irritated by this so called community we black people had, because I knew that it was made up. Cited to reach out to other races, and I used the fact that was black as a way to reach a contact zone. Contact zones are defined as social spaces where cultures meet, clash, and grapple With each Other, often in highly asymmetrical relations. (Pratt 487). In the Mary Louise Prates essay, Arts of the Contact Zone, Pratt reports the advantages and disadvantages that co ntact zones bring. Pratt emphasizes that a contact zone allows people to interact between cultures and break the cultural boundary. When a contact zone is established, people are able to gain a new perspective because they are able to interact with people of a foreign culture. For example, when first met my best friend, Jill Simon, saw her as typical white girl. Figured that she probably talked proper, had a dog, and wore Juicy Couture. Although she did live up to the typical white girl standard that is expected, she grew to become one of the most important people in my life, We started our friendship when she overheard me making a comment about my hair. Being black, I obviously had different hair than she did, and she wanted to know how worked with mine. Her interest in my hair is what led to us talking about where was from, Vichy led to the subject of my culture and Vichy community identified myself with. Our difference in race coerced us to a subject that later allowed me and Jill to adhere our different cultures. Valuing our differences is one thing that helped our friendship grow. However our differences did come With ups and downs. Being that we were from completely different backgrounds, different situations were difficult for Jill to understand about me, and for me to understand about her. Couldnt just go and sleep over at her house without my parents knowing at least a few days in advance. Couldnt just leave my house at any time without my parents knowing, ND I feel that we had a different level of respect for our parents. Its not that Jill was rude to her parents, its just that there were something that she and her siblings got away with, that my siblings and would never even come close to getting away with. Live that this difference was something that was hard grasp in the beginning of our friendship. She would call me and want me to go out with her within the next hour, and she would actually get upset when had to decline, As our friendship progressed, Jill understood me and my family more. If she anted me to go somewhere with her, she would communicate that to me days in advance as to avoid me not being able to go out with her. This shows how Jill adapted to my way of planning things which brings on an example that Pratt gives in her essay. Pratt explains a story about the piece of work called, New Chronicle of Good Government written by Gunman Pomp, a Quiches mar What was written by Gunman Pomp was a 1,200 page letter in two languages that told the unique story about a culture that was dominated by the Spanish. It spoke about the torture that the Spanish brought which is quite different than he glorified, Spanish version Of the conquest that many Other countries had grown to know. .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .postImageUrl , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:hover , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:visited , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:active { border:0!important; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:active , .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5100f2c8897eb4eee0ba78405579ef2c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Macbeth EssayPomp writes his story from both points of view which brings on Prates point Of transfiguration. Transfiguration is important because it is the process of cultural transformation, as in the creation of new cultures and societies, resulting from intercultural conflict, struggle and change (491). When it came to the Spanish contrasting the Quiches culture, Pomp had to learn how to adapt to the new culture and new rules, however he didnt lose his own culture, hence him telling his story from two perspectives. The same applies for how Jill had to adapt to my familys way of doing things, and how transfiguration of both our cultures helped aid the conflict of miscommunication between me and Pratt argues that transfiguration seers to reflect the natural tendency of people to resolve conflicts over time, rather than exacerbating them (491). This bringing together of different cultures helps people live in realistic communities rather than the perfect, imagined ones that come to mind when a community is brought up. In Arts of the Contact Zone, Pratt quotes author, Benedict Anderson and acknowledges what he calls %imagined communities. Imagined communities are communities in which people will never know most of their fellow members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the mind of each lives the image of communion (493). We, as human beings tend to make communities out to be a place where everybody gets along everybody else, and everyone accepts the culture of their neighbor _ However this is not the case in most, if not all, communities. As Brooklyn Park showed me, along with a community comes different cultures, beliefs and languages. Jill and I live in the same city but found that culturally we were very distant. Transfiguration and using race as a way to reach a contact zone helped me and Jill find a centered sense Of reality. Transfiguration, Pratt argued, was the product of contact zones (491). I agree that transfiguration described the phenomenon Of merging and converging different cultures, and that it is much needed between the black and the white community because there has been so much separation from the beginning. The whole conflict of slavery and racism in the past, is the main thing that aides to he separation of the two communities. Although there is still sometimes conflict within the white and the black community, the past few years have brought on a sense of transfiguration with the fact that we have schools exploring different cultures with things such as foreign exchange programs and international day, Interracial and intercultural relationships are becoming more acceptable and we are realizing that there is black on black crime as there is white on white crime. We are not always jumping to the conclusion that race has to do with every negative thing that happens to one us. We are slowly, but surly moving on.

World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism Essay Example

World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism Paper I have mixed feelings about whether World War Two spelt the end of US Isolationism. I believe that to some extent this time was the least Isolationist the US had ever been, however, in my opinion American interests always focused worldwide despite some presidents isolationist foreign policies. Churchill wanted the United States involved in the war, openly seeking a fighting incident that would bring the neutral nation into the conflict. On August 4, 1941, Churchill and Roosevelt met for the first time, after corresponding for two years. The Atlantic Charter was one result of their meeting; another was the beginning of a deep personal friendship. They shared several common characteristics: both came from elite backgrounds, both were patricians, and both saw their roles as democratic noblemen. Churchill returned to England and told his War Cabinet that Roosevelt would wage war but would not declare it. The incident Churchill needed occurred on September 4, 1941, when the USS Greer, on a mail run to Iceland, was involved in a fighting incident with a German U-boat. In his subsequent address to the nation, FDR tended to distort the actual facts, using the occasion to begin unrestricted convoying and a limited, defensive naval war. Then on October 31, 1941, a German U-boat torpedoed a U.S. ship. This signaled what was to be the end of American neutrality. The bombing of Pearl Harbor in December, 1941, marked the definite end of American isolationism in practical terms. We will write a custom essay sample on World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on World War Two caused America to reluctantly abandon the policy of Isolationism specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer During the war, the U.S. sent troops to Asia, Africa and Europe. After the wars end, the remnants of the League of Nations re-formed as the United Nations, and this time the United States was front and center. Under the Truman Doctrine, American economic and military aid went to nations threatened by communism. The Marshall Plan helped rebuild Europe and the Cold War made an American military presence abroad a foregone conclusion for the next 50 years. Roosevelt did not live long enough to see the war unfold though after declaring war he suddenly died of a brain hemorrhage. Roosevelt was replaced by Harry Truman. The US had avoided war in World War One because of many factors economic reasons and public opinion being the most important ones. However by 1945 things had changed and Truman looked upon the war as a brilliant opportunity. Fuelled by German Hatred after the events of Pearl Harbour, Truman had the public on his side. He had the backing of Congress and his own personal views that the US needed war as an economic opportunity (selling munitions) and his slogan to make the world safe for democracy. (Safe from German Imperialism.) With all of these positive factors the US entered a war of opportunities. Abroad, World War II brought an end to American isolationism. In the spring of 1945, the US joined delegates from 50 nations in signing the charter for a permanent United Nations, a year before the International Monetary Fund and World Bank were established to promote economic cooperation among nations. But the biggest challenge facing the United States in the postwar world was the souring of relations with the Soviet Union as a result of that countrys domination of Eastern Europe and support of communist insurgencies around the world. As part of the effort to contain the Soviet spread and to revive the economies of Western Europe, the United States launched the European Recovery Program (usually known as the Marshall Plan,) which poured $13 billion of aid into the region. In addition, the US adopted a policy of containment, shoring up non-communist areas in danger of encroachment. Thus, when the Soviet Union blockaded all surface routes into Berlin, the US and Britain launched the Berlin Airlift, supplying the western sectors of the city by air. We do have to question however whether the US was truly Isolationist. It would have been ignorant for any president to ignore world matters as if there was an opportunity for intervention then the US may have been able to capitalize on a situation and gain extra lands. After all, raw materials in the US could not last for ever. In my opinion Truman had no intention of remaining Isolationist for the World War, despite his election pledge of US Isolationism. Throughout the war he supplied Britain with loans and fighting equipment as well s increasing the US armies and Navies and supporting the Ententes blockade of Germany. World War Two was a major point of change for the US. From now on they saw it their duty to intervene in world matters (world policeman) because they were the worlds most influential power, and after all could benefit with the gaining of land and resources from certain countries. Take for example the recent war in Iraq, a country where the US is now gaining valuable amounts of oil from. Although the US role as a world policeman is supposedly world based, in my opinion this is not the case. Take for example events after world war two. There have been major wars in Vietnam and in Iraq, but these were only brought about because of threats to the US country. Indeed the US are reluctant to get involved in any war which has no effect on them. Vietnam was brought about by American fear of Communism, and wars in Iraq because of its valuable resources and the terrorism attacks of September the eleventh. During the Cold War, some Americans argued that the country should withdraw from the United Nations; but the Cold War, as a patriotic and ideological crusade, kept those voices from receiving widespread support. Today, the United States government and military is whatever word would best describe the extreme opposite of isolationist. In my opinion this is how they have always secretly been. US interests were always widespread; its just that when World War Two arrived the US were economically and socially ready to develop a world role. The breakout of war provided a perfect opportunity/excuse for the US to move away from its Isolationist image. The Challenge to Isolationism. 1. What was FDRs immediate response to the outbreak of war in Europe? Roosevelt was re-elected by the US public on the promise that he would keep the US out of World War Two. However he soon realized that war in Europe could lead to war in America and so supported the allied policy of appeasement to ensure peace. Roosevelt wanted to prepare America for the worst though. He believed the security of Europe was crucial to the security of America. He was able to persuade Congress to approve the Naval Expansion Act allowing a 20% increase in the US navy. In 1939, he got an extra $525 million for air defence. At the start of the Second World War, however, the American army still only numbered 185,000. 2. Did a majority of the US public and politicians favour isolationism in the early months of the war? 3. What legislation was included in the Neutrality Act of 4/11/39? During the 1930s, US public opinion as well as several Senators questioned the validity of US involvement in the Great War. The belief became increasingly common that the nation was deceived into taking part in this bloody conflict by Allied propaganda and to serve the interests of profit-thirsty bankers and industrialists. The conclusions of the Nye Committee in 1934, tasked with investigating the excessive profits made by the war armament industry, reinforced the antiwar position of the American people and finalizes the countrys isolationist policy. As a reaction to Germanys re-armament, and to prevent any US involvement in a possible European war, the US Congress voted the Neutrality Act, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 31, 1935. The Act prohibits trade in military material with warring countries and travel by US nationals on ships belonging to warring countries. It was amended in 1936 to prohibit loans to warring countries, and then in January and March 1937 to include civil wars. At the beginning of WWII, the possibility that Great Britain could be defeated is real and the growing Nazi threat is a cause for fear. Roosevelt realizes that the Neutrality Act imposes restrictions on possible US actions; amendments will be adopted to diminish the legislations scope. Supplying nations at war will be authorized on the cash and carry principle. President declares area around British Isles a combat zone in November 1939, and loans of military material will be possible on a land-lease agreement. Summary of Neutrality Act of 1939; This act repeals the arms embargo and substitutes a policy of cash and carry; prohibits United States vessels and citizens from entering combat zones; establishes the National Munitions Control composed of the Secretaries of States, Treasury, War, Navy, and Commerce. 4. What impact did Hitlers successful Blitzkrieg have on American attitudes? The speed with which the German army overran Western Europe shocked the American public. By June 1940, the Nazis were in control of Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium and France. Through the summer and autumn the Battle of Britain was fought with Britain and its empire standing alone against the Nazi threat. The broadcasts of journalist Ed Murrow from London during the Blitz did much to communicate to Americans the intensity of the struggle taking places, and this led to cries from the US public for American intervention in the war.